Educational / Interesting Articles, Medieval Facts, Medieval Myth Debunking

Did People Eat “Breakfast” in Medieval Times?

Today the word “breakfast” gets shuttlecocked across American streets like coffee. Ah, there’s nothing like a mug of coffee at 4 a.m. with some jazz music. Coffee’s good with breakfast, too. Hey, wait. Is that why we don’t have that much evidence of people eating breakfast Middle Ages?–because they didn’t have coffee? That’s a deep, sociological question. Today, I just want to answer the question “did people eat breakfast in the Middle Ages?” Unfortunately, I won’t be able to yes or no. There are hundreds of different answers!

did people eat breakfast in medieval times?

It goes without saying that medieval people in general ate a lot less than Americans do today. With a lack of fridges and advanced food-preservation, most people in medieval times, especially indentured people, didn’t have an easy means of making a meal before going to work, at least not as easy as many of us have it. If they didn’t keep the fire burning all night, they would have to make one with a tinder box or use an ember from the neighbors to cook a meal. Fire is precious! Households with grooms might use fire for other purposes besides cooking, too, like warming spiced wine and bath water. Where a fire is nowhere near, however, any form of liquid might be all a person needs to begin the day, assuming no bread or preserved food was near. But what about other people?–priests, soldiers, housewives?–did they always have their first meal of the day early in the morning?

Advertisements

Employers with the means to have a meal ready at the early moments of the day generally had breakfast earlier than people who had to do everything themselves. What we do know for sure is that many indentured workers were given nuncheons (snacks) as part of their wages. These nuncheons would be eaten during fast breaks before dinner, a large midday meal, and before supper, a second meal for after the day’s work was through. Generally, dinner and supper–two large meals instead of three–was the norm. But what about breakfast?

food in the middle ages medieval times

When speaking about the monastic and much of the familia in general, it wouldn’t be sensible for us to dispute the broad statement that there was a custom of “fasting piously” during the night. You definitely weren’t sinning if you skipped breakfast because you didn’t break your fast. Monks ate “collations” and then read Collationes by Cassian, and they would pray for forgiveness if eating was the first thing they did in the morning. There’re much more important things to do like witnessing God’s word! Veni Sancti Spiritus! Then again, every priest is different.

Armies on campaign carried a lot of preserved foods like biscuits and salted meats. Whatever the armies’ priorities were, breaking fast early in the day wasn’t a necessary given for any soldier. It took organization and order to issue meals to the entire army, and there might be more serious things to spend time organizing against when on campaign than breakfast. On certain campaigns, food might come as an extreme luxury during all eight hours of the day (Matins, Lauds, Prime, Tierce, Sext, None, Vespers, Compline).

Breakfast was sometimes given to the infant, the sick and the elderly by caretakers to help regain and maintain strength. If you were a healthy adult, you might be seen as weak for needing a breakfast depending on the context. The reason I speak so generally is because obviously customs in 10th century Paris were a lot different than 15th century Florence and Venice where people on average ate very well.

Advertisements

In a typical household somewhere in Europe during the Middle Ages, if you had some instant food you could eat in the morning before work like bread or vegetables that didn’t need to be cooked, or indeed leftovers from yesterday’s supper which had been kept warm next to the fire overnight, it might be wiser to save these foods for today’s supper anyways, especially if you had other people to feed. But it shouldn’t surprise anyone if people had a quick bite of some bread or leftovers before heading out the door in the morning, especially if their stomachs were grumbling.

In the average household of medieval cities, it was the wife’s job to go to the market almost every morning to get ingredients for the meals her family would have that day. This practice is a direct consequence of having a lack of ways to preserve food. Today, we can make breakfast in two minutes. In feudal society, there were only so many roles dedicated to preparing and cooking food. This same world had even fewer sinks, towels and soaps.

Almost every small thing we take for granted when it comes to making a quick breakfast today didn’t exist or was very rare in medieval times: electricity, running-water, transportation. Now ask yourself, if you didn’t have a steward and dozens of grooms to manage your fires, your laundry, your water-supply, your waste-management and so on, would you have breakfast? Or would you maximize the efficiency of your time by getting your arse to the fields?

In medieval records we have gobs and gobs of accounts of people having supper but very little of people having breakfast, and I think that’s for a good a reason. To wrap things up, let’s just that the way breakfast is treated in today’s Western culture didn’t exist in medieval times.

Sources:

  1. Life in a Medieval City by Frances and Joseph Gies
  2. Food in Medieval Times by Melitta Weiss Adamson

Do you appreciate respectful treatment of historical customs in medieval fiction? Subscribe to my newsletter for future book launches!

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

4 thoughts on “Did People Eat “Breakfast” in Medieval Times?

  1. In “Soldier of the Mist”, the people are described as eating only two meals – the first and the second – and sometimes they eat the first quite late in the day. Prior to this, I kinda took breakfast for granted, too. What you say here makes perfect sense though!

  2. What a weak load of sh. It sounds like you chewed up a few lindy beige videos then puked the contetns over my screenn. Is any of this actually investigated or researched or did you just put your efforts solely into drawing ‘funny’ captions on someone else’s medieval photographs?

    1. If you can point out where I’m wrong, please do. And yes I asked professors and went to the library at my university before writing this. There’s not much out there on the topic. And there’s always room for improvement, especially in terms of attitude 😉

Speak your mind freely

%d bloggers like this: